FOUR
WHITE MEN!
The
best argument against renewal of Superintendent Joe Burke’s contract is the
arrogance of the four, White, male school committee men from Forest Park and
East Forest Park who unanimously voted to renew Burke’s contract during the
absence of the two school committee women, one of whom is our lone minority
representative. Not only did their vote
highlight the fact that a majority minority school population’s fate is subject
to the political whims of the four, it also confirmed the need for another form
of representation. If it must be ward
representation, so be it, although it is looking more and more like an
appointed school committee would be most desirable. Only problem is that finding an objective appointment process
would not be easy in Springfield’s charged political environment.
BARACK
ATTACK 1
Keep
your eyes on the prize. They’re trying
to steal it! The "they" are
the Clintonites who intend to use the Democratic Party’s “Super Delegates” to
give Hillary Clinton the Democratic Party nomination even if Barack Obama ends
up winning the popular vote. I don’t
know about you, but if Barack Obama is robbed, not only am I not voting
for Hillary but the next time I vote, I will be a registered Independent.
BARACK
ATTACK 2
The
second way they are trying to steal the election from Barack Obama is familiar
to us. They are trying to change the
rules. After voting to not seat the
Florida and Michigan delegations and asking the candidates not to campaign in
those states, Hillary Clinton, who surreptitiously campaigned in both and won
both, is demanding that delegates from both now be seated. Barack Obama, who followed the rules and
complied with the Party’s request to not campaign in those states, has enough
delegates to challenge Hillary all the way to the convention, where it appears
he will likely win the nomination unless the rules are changed and Michigan and
Florida delegations are seated. Keep
your eye on the prize or they’ll steal it!
BARACK
ATTACK 3
Nothing
is sadder than watching the old guard Civil Rights leaders demonstrating their
willingness to cheat to get Hillary Clinton nominated over Barack Obama. Listening to the likes of Andrew Young,
Julian Bond, Mary Francis Berry and Roger Wilkins urging the Democrats to
change the rules after the fact to favor Clinton’s nomination is nothing short
of disgusting. The history of chicanery
and treachery that gave White folks the historical advantage over Black folks
in the first place is what the Civil Rights movement was designed to correct. It is difficult to ignore or digest the
irony of these leaders of the “Movement” calling for some of the same trickery
in order to lift a White candidate over the first viable Black presidential
candidate to emerge out of the Civil Rights struggle.
BARACK
DEFENSE
Have
you noticed the positive spin on Barack Obama’s candidacy coming from
conservative Fox News and MSNBC’s equally conservative “Morning Joe” and from
conservative columnists like Charles Krauthammer? And, I almost fell out of my chair when I read a recent editorial
in The Wall Street Journal (February 10, 2008), which summed up the
conservative commentary:
“”Unprecedented numbers of people of all kinds are attracted to his
(Obama’s) campaign. He is gifted with
an ability to inspire us unlike any figure in decades….(H)e embodies the spirit
of hope and renewal of our quintessential American faith that we can, and must,
do better….The progress that Mr. Obama promises is not aimed at any particular
group of Americans. It’s a new freedom
for all Americans, a freedom to dream again and to believe that we are not
stuck in the past….It’s (Obama’s message) opening up the doors to a new
generation of leadership, because so many people are tired of the partisan
bickering and the status quo cynicism.”
Wow! The Wall Street Journal! Of course, the editorial was written by
former Virginia Governor L. Douglas Wilder, who was the first Black Governor
elected in the entire United States.
But, still, it was in The Wall Street Journal.
CLEMENS,
CLEMENS, ROGER CLEMENS!
If
you saw Roger Clemens (I spelled it “Clemmons” in our last issue, which tells
you how much I follow baseball.) testify before the Senate Legislative
Committee, then you had to conclude that he is not only a great pitcher but an
even greater liar. If the standard
applied to Black Barry Bonds is followed, both he and the man who injected him
with steroids and human growth hormones will be indicted for perjury. They made Bonds look like a saint. We are watching!
REMEMBERING
HAROLD FORD
The
Hartford Courant’s Stan Simpson, in a recent article
(February 10, 2008), gently reminded us that an earlier up-and-coming Black
politician from Tennessee might have easily become America’s first Black
President had his meteoric rise (six terms as a Congressman starting when he
was only 26) not been interrupted by a close Senate race against a White
candidate who, at the last minute, made the race about race. Ford, who lost by only 3%, is now chairman
of the Democratic Leadership Council, the same moderate group that catapulted
Bill Clinton to the presidency.
SOMETHING
IS BREWING IN AMERICAN RACE RELATIONS
A
Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll showed that more Americans would be
willing to vote for a Black presidential candidate (81%) than for a woman (76%)
or Mormon candidate (50%). The stunning
numbers may reflect the changing racial climate in America and seem to provide
a simple explanation for why Barack Obama is doing so well. It looks like the Republicans were wise to
get Mitt Romney out of the race.
AND
MAYBE L. DOUG WILDER KNOWS WHAT IT IS
Wilder
wrote: “What I’ve seen during my lifetime is a tremendous amount of social,
racial and economic progress. And what
I see coming in the future is an opportunity to make greater strides. Make no mistake, there are false hopes. Believing that if we ignore problems they
will go away is a false hope. Believing
that, if we are patient and wait in line, the powerful will give us a turn at
the wheel is a false hope. The greatest
false hope is perhaps the prejudice that only insiders know what is best, and
that only those who have spent time in the White House know how to make
government work….We know very well what change means and we know what hope
means. That is why we must learn to
ride the waves of change and that is why America is crying out for leadership
that takes possession of the problems we face….Mr. Obama is a forceful voice on
the American scene who will be our agent for meaningful change—a voice
committed to carry our nation to greater heights and to heal the divisions
within our country. Unlike any other
candidate, he inspires so many people of every description to step up and say:
Yes, we can. (The Wall Street
Journal, February 10, 2008)
BLACK/HISPANIC
POLITICAL RIFT IS WHITE MEDIA FICTION
Los
Angeles Times columnist, Gregory Rodriguez, in an
article reprinted in The Hartford Courant (January 29, 2008) wrote of
Hillary Clinton’s large Hispanic vote in Nevada: “…pundits embraced the idea
that Hispanic voters simply didn’t like the fact that her opponent was
black…” Rodriguez than goes on to rebut
the idea by pointing out that: “In 1983, Harold Washington (Black) pulled 80%
of the Hispanic vote in Chicago, David Dinkins (Black) won 73% in New York in
1989. And Denver’s Wellington Webb
(Black) garnered more than 70% in 1991, as did Ron Kirk (Black) of Dallas in
1995 and then again in 1997 and 1999….In Los Angeles, all three black members
of Congress represent heavily Hispanic districts and ultimately couldn’t
survive without significant Hispanic support.
Five other black House members from elsewhere in the country represent
district that are more than 25 percent Hispanic—including New York’s Charles
Rangel and Texan Al Green—and are also heavily dependent on Hispanics…So, given
all this evidence, why did this notion get repeated so nonchalantly?” Rodriquez preceded his comments by writing:
“…the evidence is overwhelming enough to make you wonder why in the world the
Clinton campaign would want to portray Hispanic voters as too unrelentingly
racist to vote for Barack Obama.” Oh,
we know why, Mr. Rodriquez, we know why!
MARY
BARKSDALE-LAWS MADE HISTORY FROM MASON SQUARE IN SPRINGFIELD
Born in 1920, Mary Barksdale-Laws attended Spellman College in 1939 and migrated to Springfield in 1940. In 1952 she graduated from nursing school and became a licensed L.P.N. and went to work for the Holyoke Visiting Nurses Association and later for Springfield Hospital (Now BayState Medical). She also became a prominent businesswoman when she opened and operated the Hurstdale Rest Home on Courtland Street for 27 years. Hurstdale was the first and only Black-owned rest home in Western Massachusetts. n